According to the NYPost, Mayor Micheal Bloomberg spent $109.2 million to win a third term. His Dem opponent spent $9.4 mill. and lost by 5 pts. What does this prove?
A) That sophisticated New Yorkers can be distracted by repitition, just like everybody else.
B) That elections are not about health care, financial reform or anything else. They are about money.
C) What do you get for the man who has everything? New York, New York.
D) It worked for Ceasar. Why wouldn't it work for Bloomberg?
E) Well, there goes the kids' inheritance.
F) You get the kind of goverment you pay for, and the kind of elections you pay for. And if you let somebody else pay, it is their election and their government.
G) We had the jazz age, the gilded age, and now we have the ego age.
H) Now, why doesn't Mel Gibson spend that kind of money to convince us he was just kidding?
I) It proves that buying votes is so passe'.
J) Horse racing may be the sport of kings, but politics is the sport of rich control freaks.
K) Being Mayor is just a tax dodge for Michael.
L) It could be worse. It could be raining.
M) We already know what he thinks of the electorate. Now, you're just complaining about the price.
No comments:
Post a Comment