Andrew Breitbart, the man who funded the Acorn "pimp videos" has told POLITICO that Rachel Maddow was "intellectually dishonest" and had a "bad business model". What would the best response to him be?
A) What would you know about intellectual anything? You have to have an intellect to know anthing about them.
B) He needs a short sharp punch to in his intellectual organ. His butt,
C) He better lay off. Rachel is the short smart gay sister I never had. I'll demobalizethe the bum.
D) Like the Supreme Court, he seems to have confused opinion with profit. Has he ever held an opinion he could not profit from?
E) Stupitity is its own reward.
F) As Jesus said, "Blessed are the weak in brains. For they shall inherit the Republican Party."
G) In the first place Adam Smith was not a moral figure. He was an economist. And we just had more proof of what idiots they are. In the second place... your ugly, you schmuck.
H) Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but the ditherings of a dishonest liarer and idiot are of little interest to me.
I) Don't shoot Rachel. You'll just make her mad.
J) Rachel Maddow, drooling in her sleep, is twice the man you will ever be. Stick that up your business model.
K) I fear you have confused intellectually dishonest with legally dishonest. Lying is not a crime unless you do in the furtherance of a crime. Then it is.
L) You worse nightmare, I guess. A smart woman with bigger balls than you.
M) Let me ask you this. Is Rachel Maddow sexier with the glasses or without. Oh, I forgot I am not writing for "People" magazine anymore.
N) Oh, shut up you pathetic fraud.
No comments:
Post a Comment